September 2025

September 2025 | Oceanography

59

selected to participate in MPOWIR conferences also gain access

to additional coaching on negotiation, goal-setting, and inclusive

leadership. MPOWIR senior leaders feel more confident in sug-

gesting improvements to policies and procedures impacting the

career success of women+, initiating mentoring programs at their

home institutions, and taking on leadership roles.

Mentoring, while rewarding, also presents some challenges,

notably in terms of time commitment, as mentors juggle demand-

ing research and administrative responsibilities, limiting the

time available for dedicated mentorship. This commitment often

requires flexible scheduling and the willingness to dedicate signif-

icant personal time. Balancing the role of advisor, confidant, and

career coach can be complex, requiring emotional intelligence and

adaptability. Addressing sensitive topics like work-life balance,

imposter syndrome, or career setbacks requires empathy, tact, and

discretion. Mentors can experience stress over the perceived qual-

ity of their advice, questioning whether their guidance is benefi-

cial and relevant. This concern is compounded by the emotional

weight of mentorship of exceptional young scientists subject to

systemic challenges and a well-known “leaky pipeline.” MPOWIR’s

leadership and mentorship training, combined with the advan-

tages of co-mentoring and being part of a mentor community,

equips mentors to effectively navigate these challenges.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

The supplementary materials are available online at https://doi.org/10.5670/

oceanog.2025.e307.

REFERENCES

Abel, M.R., M. Behl, A. Kladzyk Constantino, and A. Kellerman. 2024. Mentors as

career investors to empower women’s leadership in geosciences. Nature Reviews

Earth & Environment 5:553–555, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00581-7.

Allen, T.D., M.L. Poteet, and S.M. Burroughs. 1997. The mentor’s perspective: A qualita-

tive inquiry and future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior 51(1):70–89,

https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1997.1596.

Butz, A.R., A. Byars-Winston, P. Leverett, J. Branchaw, and C. Pfund. 2018. Promoting

STEM trainee research self-efficacy: A mentor training intervention. UI journal 9(1).

Chun, J.U., J.J. Sosik, and N.Y. Yun. 2012. A longitudinal study of mentor and

protégé outcomes in formal mentoring relationships. Journal of Organizational

Behavior 33(8):1,071–1,094, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1781.

Clem, S., S. Legg, S. Lozier, and C. Mouw. 2014. The impact of MPOWIR: A decade

of investing in mentoring women in physical oceanography. Oceanography 27(4)

supplement:39–48, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.113.

EEOC (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission). 2019. Annual Report on

the Federal Workforce. Special Topic: Women in STEM. EEOC’s Office of Federal

Operations, 23 pp., https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/2022-07/Women in

STEM Special Topics Report FY 20 Final_1.pdf.

Fowler, J.L., D.S. Fowler, and J.G. O’Gorman. 2019. Worth the investment? An exam-

ination of the organisational outcomes of a formal structured mentoring pro-

gram. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 59(1):109–131, https://doi.org/​

10.1111/1744-7941.12252.

Gage, S., J. Gerson, and X. Shinbrot. 2024. “NSF 101: The Mentoring plan,” https://new.

nsf.gov/science-matters/nsf-101-mentoring-plan.

Ghosh, R., and T. Reio. 2012. Career benefits associated with mentoring for mentors:

A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior 83:106–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/​

j.jvb.2013.03.011.

IOC-UNESCO. 2020. Global Ocean Science Report 2020–Charting Capacity for

Ocean Sustainability. K. Isensee, ed, UNESCO Publishing, Paris.

Kumari, K., S. Ali, M. Batool, L. Cioca, and J. Abbas. 2022. The interplay between

leaders’ personality traits and mentoring quality and their impact on mentees’ job

satisfaction and job performance. Frontiers in Psychology 13:937470, https://doi.org/​

10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937470.

Legg, S., C. Wang, E. Kappel, and L. Thompson. 2023. Gender equity in ocean-

ography. Annual Review of Marine Science 15(1):15–39, https://doi.org/10.1146/

annurev-marine-032322-100357.

Lewis, S.A., A. Holloway, and K. Yarincik. 2023. Assessing diversity in US ocean

science institutions. Oceanography 36(4):10–20, https://doi.org/10.5670/

oceanog.2024.134.

Lozier, M.S. 2006. Mentoring program for women in physical oceanography.

EOS 87(12):123–126, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006EO120005.

Mackenzie, B. 2015. The “leaky pipeline”: Examining and addressing the loss of

women at consecutive career stages in marine engineering, science and technol-

ogy. Pp. 69–81 in Maritime Women: Global Leadership. M. Kitada, E. Williams, and

L. Loloma Froholdt, eds, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Mouw, C.B., S. Clem, S. Legg, and J. Stockard. 2018. Meeting mentoring

needs in physical oceanography: An evaluation of the impact of MPOWIR.

Oceanography 31(4):171–179, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2018.405.

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2019.

The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM. National Academies Press,

Washington, DC, 306 pp., https://doi.org/10.17226/25568.

NSF Office of Integrative Activities. 2024. “About,” https://new.nsf.gov/od/oia/ia/

stc#about-33a.

O’Connell, S. 2014. Women of the academy and the sea: 2000–2014.

Oceanography 27(4) supplement:15–22, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.108.

Orcutt, B.N., and I. Cetinić. 2014. Women in oceanography: Continuing challenges.

Oceanography 27(4) supplement:5–13, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.106.

Pfund, C., A. Byars-Winston, J. Branchaw, S. Hurtado, and K. Eagan. 2016. Defining

attributes and metrics of effective research mentoring relationships. AIDS and

Behavior 20:238–248, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1384-z.

Ragins, B., J.L. Cotton, and J. Miller. 2000. Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of

mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes.

Academy of Management Journal 43(6).

Ranganathan, M., E. Lalk, L.M. Freese, M.A. Freilich, J. Wilcots, M.L. Duffy, and

R. Shivamoggi. 2021. Trends in the representation of women among US geo-

science faculty from 1999 to 2020: The long road toward gender parity.

AGU Advances 2(3):e2021AV000436, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021AV000436.

Stolzenberg, E.B., K. Eagan, H.B. Zimmerman, J. Berdan Lozano, N.-M. Cesar-Davis,

M.C. Aragon, and C. Rios-Aguilar. 2019. Undergraduate Teaching Faculty: The HERI

Faculty Survey 2016–2017. Higher Education Research Institute, University of

California, Los Angeles, 111 pp.

Thompson, L., R. Perez, and A. Shevenell. 2011. Closed ranks in oceanography.

Nature Geoscience 4:211–212, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1113.

Wanberg, C.R., J. Kammeyer-Mueller, and M. Marchese. 2006. Mentor and protégé

predictors and outcomes of mentoring in a formal mentoring program. Journal of

Vocational Behavior 69(3):410–423, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.05.010.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

MPOWIR received initial support from the National Science Foundation through a col-

laborative research award (#2148704 and #2148705) to Colleen Mouw and Mona Behl

at the University of Rhode Island and the University of Georgia, respectively. (It was

terminated by the agency in April 2025.) Support for MPOWIR is also provided by the

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors contributed to all aspects of the article.

​COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare no competing interests.

AUTHORS

Mona Behl (mbehl@uga.edu), Marine Extension and Georgia Sea Grant, University

of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. Sarah Clem and Colleen Mouw, University

of Rhode Island, Graduate School of Oceanography, Narragansett, RI, USA.

Sonya Legg, Center for Ocean Leadership, University Corporation for Atmospheric

Research (UCAR), Boulder, CO, USA. Erin Hackett, Coastal Carolina University,

Conway, SC, USA. Kristin Burkholder, Stonehill College, Easton, MA, USA.

Kristopher B. Karnauskas, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA. Sarah T. Gille,

Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla,

CA, USA. Lauren A. Freeman, Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Newport,

Newport, RI, USA. Karan Venayagamoorthy, Department of Civil, Architectural, and

Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO,

USA. Jerry L. Miller, Science for Decisions LLC, Hemingway, SC, USA.

ARTICLE CITATION

Behl, M., S. Clem, C. Mouw, S. Legg, E. Hackett, K. Burkholder, K.B. Karnauskas,

S.T. Gille, L.A. Freeman, K. Venayagamoorthy, and J.L. Miller. 2025. Mentors:

The hidden beneficiaries of mentoring. Oceanography 38(3):51–59, https://doi.org/​

10.5670/oceanog.2025.e307.

COPYRIGHT & USAGE

This is an open access article made available under the terms of the Creative

Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/

by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in

any medium or format as long as users cite the materials appropriately, provide a

link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate the changes that were made to

the original content.