September 2025

Oceanography | Vol. 38, No. 3

28

pH and therefore a potential mitiga-

tion of OA (Doney et al., 2024; “NaOH

addition,” “Na2CO3 addition,” and

“NaHCO3 addition” lines in Figure 2;

see also Figure 3). To date, modeling

studies have suggested large uncer-

tainty in the OA mitigation potential of

OAE (Butenschön et al., 2021; Palmiéri

and Yool, 2024). On a local scale, OAE

might prove to be beneficial for miti-

gating the impact of OA, especially in

environments with less water exchange

(Khangaonkar et  al., 2024). However,

this approach greatly depends on the

spatial and temporal scales and evolu-

tion of the perturbed alkalinity (Suitner

et  al., 2024). A recent study suggests

that connecting OAE efficiency, air-sea

gas exchange, and ocean circulation

could be a useful tool for considering

local implications for OA (Zhou et al.,

2025). Once equilibrated, the only ben-

efit to OA is an offset from further acid-

ification from continued CO2 uptake

(i.e., more CO2 can go into the ocean

without causing further OA), rather

than a reversal (i.e., removing CO2 and

increasing pH back to historic levels)

(Mongin et  al., 2021). Interestingly, if

OAE improves the seawater chemistry

for shell-building organisms through

raising calcium carbonate satura-

tion states, increased net calcification

rates (one of the key ecological pro-

cesses impacted by OA) would con-

sume alkalinity and increase sea­water

pCO2, thus potentially negating any

carbon removal efforts at local (habitat)

scales (Renforth and Henderson, 2017).

The type of alkalinity used, and the

method and rate of OAE addition, will

all determine OAE’s ability to mitigate

OA (Figure 2). Furthermore, if OAE is

carried out incorrectly (i.e., adding too

much alkalinity too rapidly), it could

increase the carbonate mineral satu-

ration state and stimulate precipita-

tion (Renforth and Henderson, 2017),

thereby consuming alkalinity and

increasing pCO2 levels. In this scenario,

OAE could exacerbate OA by reducing

seawater’s buffering capacity. Although

FIGURE 3. Schematic of the air-sea equilibrium and carbonate chemistry of seawater before, during,

and after mCDR interventions, highlighting potential connections to ocean acidification (OA) as indi-

cated by the dark red annotations. “OA↓” indicates mitigation of OA (elevated pH), “OA =” indicates no

change in OA, “OA=/↓” indicates no change/possible mitigation of OA (elevating pH), and “OA↓?” indi-

cates possible exacerbation of OA (lower pH). For the biological mCDR column, long-term storage is

dependent on the vertical partitioning of the biological carbon pump, and where the organic matter

finally ends up. It is highly likely that the organic matter remineralizes back to CO2 in the deep ocean,

then potentially exacerbates OA. For the other two columns, long-term storage is likely to be stable in

DIC form (OAE) or in geological storage (DOCCS), where there is low likelihood of leakage back into the

marine system as CO2 (which could then exacerbate OA).